Kai Cenat Reacts to Being Named in Drake’s UMG Lawsuit
Kai Cenat, the wildly popular Twitch streamer, was recently taken by surprise when his name appeared in the ongoing legal feud between Drake and Universal Music Group (UMG). The lawsuit revolves around allegations that UMG allowed the widespread dissemination of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track, “Not Like Us,” which Drake claims contains defamatory content. Cenat’s on-stream reaction to the track is cited in the lawsuit, leaving him and his fans stunned.
Kai Cenat’s Shocked Reaction
While streaming on Twitch, Kai Cenat stumbled upon his name in the lawsuit as he read through the details. Initially misunderstanding the legal jargon, he exclaimed:
“Wait, why am I in this? Am I getting sued?!”
After a moment of panic, Kai realized he wasn’t being sued but had been referenced in the lawsuit as an example of how the diss track spread rapidly on platforms like Twitch and YouTube. He recalled the night he reacted to the track, sharing:
“I was told to stay on stream!”
The incident dates back to when Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” dropped, a song that takes pointed shots at Drake. UMG is accused of removing copyright restrictions on the track to maximize its reach, which Drake claims was a deliberate attempt to harm his reputation.
UMG’s Role in the Lawsuit
Drake’s lawsuit alleges that UMG’s actions not only defamed him but also endangered his safety. Following the release of “Not Like Us,” Drake cited multiple incidents, including a shooting at his Toronto home that injured a security guard. The lawsuit claims these events were fueled by the song’s “dangerous” and “false” allegations.
Drake’s legal team accuses UMG of using streaming bots and exaggerated promotional tactics to artificially boost the track’s popularity. They argue that the record label’s goal was to devalue Drake’s music and brand, gaining leverage in renegotiating his contract.
Despite the song’s incendiary content, Drake emphasized that his issue lies solely with UMG and not with Kendrick Lamar, the artist behind the track.
“This lawsuit is not about the artist who created ‘Not Like Us,’” the filing states. “It is entirely about UMG, the company that chose to publish and promote false and dangerous content.”
Kai Cenat Denies Involvement in the Spread
Kai Cenat addressed rumors that he and other content creators were allegedly paid by UMG to react to the track. He vehemently denied these claims, stating:
“Nobody paid us to react to that. People think we’re that weak? Nah, it was just a crazy moment. And yeah, the views were wild, but it’s not like I got a paycheck from UMG for it.”
Cenat also reflected on the success of his reaction videos, noting that both his Drake and Kendrick-related content generated significant engagement:
“Both ways, I ate crazy. All my content’s monetized, so I’m good.”
UMG’s Official Response
In response to the lawsuit, UMG issued a statement denying Drake’s accusations, labeling them as “untrue” and “illogical.” They highlighted their longstanding investment in Drake’s career, stating:
“We’ve helped Drake achieve unprecedented success. These claims are disappointing and without merit.”
UMG also criticized the lawsuit for attempting to “silence” creative expression, referencing Drake’s own history of engaging in rap battles.
A Legal Battle with Wide Implications
This case is not just about one diss track; it highlights larger issues surrounding music distribution, copyright, and platform accountability. For content creators like Kai Cenat, the incident serves as a reminder of how their reactions to trending content can place them in the middle of high-profile disputes.
As the legal battle between Drake and UMG escalates, fans, creators, and industry insiders will be watching closely. This lawsuit could set a precedent for how record labels and artists navigate their disputes in the digital era.
