Drake Gets Fiery Response From UMG Over ‘Not Like Us’ Defamation Lawsuit
Drake has sparked a legal battle with Universal Music Group (UMG) after the release of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us,” claiming the song’s lyrics have caused reputational damage and led to real-world consequences. The lawsuit, filed on January 15 in New York federal court, accuses UMG of defamation and suggests that the music giant prioritized corporate greed over the safety of its artists.
Drake’s Allegations Against UMG
The lawsuit claims that UMG, which manages both Drake and Kendrick Lamar’s respective record labels, knowingly promoted the false allegations in “Not Like Us,” despite being aware of their inaccuracy. Drake argues that the release and promotion of the track have severely impacted his reputation, making him vulnerable to violence and threats.
The defamation lawsuit comes after a shooting incident at Drake’s Toronto home, where a security guard was injured shortly after the song’s release. The lawsuit links these incidents to the track’s controversial lyrics, alleging that they instigated hostile reactions. According to the filing, Drake has taken precautionary measures for his family’s safety, including pulling his son out of school due to security concerns.
In addition, the lawsuit alleges that UMG artificially inflated the song’s popularity using methods such as streaming bots and payola to boost “Not Like Us.” Drake asserts that this manipulation was motivated by financial gain and an attempt to undermine his music in the ongoing renegotiation of his contract.
UMG Responds to the Defamation Lawsuit
Universal Music Group wasted no time in responding to the lawsuit, calling Drake’s claims “untrue” and “illogical”. A spokesperson for UMG defended the company’s actions, arguing that they have invested heavily in Drake’s career and have worked tirelessly to promote his success worldwide. They also pointed out that Drake has previously used UMG’s platform to engage in public “rap battles” with other artists, including Lamar.
UMG also addressed Drake’s allegations, stating, “We have not and do not engage in defamation against any individual.” The company vowed to vigorously defend against the litigation and to protect the reputation of its employees, artists, and brand.
Drake’s Stance on the Lawsuit
While the lawsuit specifically targets UMG and not Kendrick Lamar, Drake emphasizes that his legal action is about the company’s role in distributing, promoting, and monetizing the song. He makes it clear that the issue is not with Lamar himself, but with UMG’s decision to release a track that Drake believes was false and damaging.
In his complaint, Drake also claims that UMG’s decision to promote the track was driven by the company’s desire to gain leverage in future negotiations over his contract. The suit positions UMG as a company that is willing to harm its artists for the sake of financial interests.
What’s Next for the Lawsuit?
Although Drake has withdrawn his pre-action petition against UMG and Spotify in one case, a separate lawsuit against UMG, iHeartMedia, and others remains active in Texas. This case is set to be heard on January 28, and it remains to be seen whether a formal lawsuit will be filed in that instance as well.
The outcome of these legal battles could have significant implications for the music industry, particularly regarding the way major labels handle disputes between artists and the influence they have over the promotion of controversial content.
Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group is one of the most high-profile legal disputes in recent memory, especially within the rap community. As the case progresses, it could reshape how record labels approach artist relationships and creative expression in the music industry. Fans and industry insiders alike will be watching closely to see how this legal drama unfolds.
